IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v3y2014i2p105-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient safety and satisfaction drivers in emergency departments re-visited – an empirical analysis using structural equation modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Christian M Sørup
  • Peter Jacobsen

Abstract

How can emergency department (ED) decision makers contribute to increase patient satisfaction rates? This question has been thoroughly investigated in many hospital departments but not so much in the ED, which has led to a number of untested hypotheses. Maximising value-added activities seen from a patient’s perspective has become an essential outcome in health care, meaning that the untested hypotheses are in need of quantitative testing. This study proposes an integrated framework in which four latent constructs reflecting principal aspects of patient care are tested. The four constructs are entitled safety and satisfaction, waiting time, information delivery, and infrastructure accordingly. As an empirical foundation, a recently published comprehensive survey in 11 Danish EDs is analysed in depth using structural equation modeling (SEM). Consulting the proposed framework, ED decision makers are provided with information of where to launch high-impact initiatives to enhance current satisfaction levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian M Sørup & Peter Jacobsen, 2014. "Patient safety and satisfaction drivers in emergency departments re-visited – an empirical analysis using structural equation modeling," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 105-116, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:105-116
    DOI: 10.1057/hs.2013.16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/hs.2013.16
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/hs.2013.16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:105-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.