IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v12y2023i4p408-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing the satisfaction of stakeholders in home health care coordination: a novel OptaPlanner CSP model

Author

Listed:
  • Liwen Zhang
  • Hervé Pingaud
  • Franck Fontanili
  • Elyes Lamine
  • Cléa Martinez
  • Christophe Bortolaso
  • Mustapha Derras

Abstract

Home Health Care Routing and Scheduling Problem (HHCRSP) has been widely investigated in operations research. In this paper, a model based on the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is proposed, which is able to deal with daily HHCRSPs. Human factors are considered in our formulation of the problem and we seek a balance between the different stakeholders’ satisfaction criteria. The considered temporal constraints are soft and controlled by the stakeholders’ personalised tolerance and satisfaction rates. We will explain how this new Satisfaction-Oriented HHCRSP (SOH2CRSP) model is built and solved by using an open-source solver: the OptaPlanner. In order to examine the impact of human factors, a study will estimate the added value provided when satisfaction is considered in the problem formulation. The comparison is based on a use case derived from the dataset of an existing HHC organisation. The numerical results will show the benefits of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Liwen Zhang & Hervé Pingaud & Franck Fontanili & Elyes Lamine & Cléa Martinez & Christophe Bortolaso & Mustapha Derras, 2023. "Balancing the satisfaction of stakeholders in home health care coordination: a novel OptaPlanner CSP model," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 408-428, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:408-428
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2023.2179947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2023.2179947
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2023.2179947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:408-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.