IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v11y2022i1p17-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-held health IT adoption across the primary-secondary care interface: a Normalisation Process Theory perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen McCarthy
  • Ciara Fitzgerald
  • Laura Sahm
  • Colin Bradley
  • Elaine K Walsh

Abstract

Patient-held Health Information Technologies (HIT) can reduce medical error by improving communication between patients and the healthcare team. Despite the proposed benefits, the roll-out of patient-held HIT solutions remains nascent, leaving considerable gaps in our understanding of the adoption challenges inherent. This paper adopts Normalisation Process Theory to study the factors which support or impede the adoption and “normalisation” of patient-held HIT, particularly across the primary-secondary care interface. The authors conducted an in-depth case study of HIT adoption across four GP practices, and the wards of a 350 bed hospital. 35 semi-structured interviews were completed. Findings point towards both user-specific and network-specific factors as significant challenges to normalisation across primary-secondary care. This includes factors related to interactional workability, skill set workability, relational integration, and contextual integration. We also discuss challenges specific to patient-held HIT adoption e.g., understanding the patient/clinician experience, supporting informal clinician networks, and spanning across IT boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen McCarthy & Ciara Fitzgerald & Laura Sahm & Colin Bradley & Elaine K Walsh, 2022. "Patient-held health IT adoption across the primary-secondary care interface: a Normalisation Process Theory perspective," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 17-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:17-29
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2020.1822146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:17-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.