Author
Listed:
- Slawomir Koziel
- Adrian Bekasiewicz
Abstract
Surrogate-based optimization (SBO) exploiting variable-fidelity EM models belongs to one of the most promising approaches to expedited simulation-driven antenna design. In SBO, the optimization burden is shifted to a coarsely discretized EM representation of the structure, whereas the high-fidelity model evaluations are carried out only to acquire data necessary for correction of the simplified model or verification of the obtained results. An important issue of variable-fidelity SBO schemes is determination of appropriate low-fidelity model, understood as finding an acceptable compromise between its evaluation time and accuracy. On one hand, unreliable responses of the model that is too coarse may lead to a failure (e.g. divergence) of the optimization algorithm. On the other hand, numerical cost of the design process significantly grows with discretization density of the computational model. Hence, adjustment of the latter should be done carefully so as to control the design cost. Normally, the trade-off between the cost and reliability of the low-fidelity model is determined manually based on the designer’s experience, mostly by checking for discrepancies between the responses for various discretization levels. In this work, the mesh setup is determined automatically through statistical analysis of correlations between the models of various fidelities. The method allows for selecting the discretization level of the low-fidelity model so that it provides acceptable trade-off between the speed and reliability of the design process. The proposed technique is verified using two structures: a dielectric resonator antenna and a slot-ring-coupled patch antenna.
Suggested Citation
Slawomir Koziel & Adrian Bekasiewicz, 2016.
"Low-fidelity model considerations for EM-driven design of antenna structures,"
Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(18), pages 2444-2458, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tewaxx:v:30:y:2016:i:18:p:2444-2458
DOI: 10.1080/09205071.2016.1255567
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tewaxx:v:30:y:2016:i:18:p:2444-2458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tewa .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.