IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/teepxx/v11y2022i3p331-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of nature-based tourism using contingent valuation survey: evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Samson Mukanjari
  • Herbert Ntuli
  • Edwin Muchapondwa

Abstract

The increasing pressure within developing countries to focus on other national objectives has led to declining fiscal transfers for conservation. This paper assesses the potential for a typical large African park such as the Kruger National Park to generate additional revenue through an entrance fee hike in order to finance park operations. This is investigated by estimating international tourists’ willingness to pay (WTP) for possible future visits. The estimated WTP is substantial, ranging from $216 to $255 per trip and $79 million to $94 million per year for all international tourists. Using a non-parametric survival function to calculate the consumer surplus that could be extracted from tourists, we show that park authorities can increase total revenue by 57% to 61% ($38 million and $40 million) per year. These findings indicate that unique African parks such as the Kruger National Park can contribute to African economies through revenues from increased entrance fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Samson Mukanjari & Herbert Ntuli & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2022. "Valuation of nature-based tourism using contingent valuation survey: evidence from South Africa," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 331-349, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:331-349
    DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2021.2010604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21606544.2021.2010604
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21606544.2021.2010604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:331-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/teep20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.