IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v3y2003i3p303-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will the Clean Development Mechanism be effectively implemented in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Tangen
  • G�rild Heggelund

Abstract

The on-going process of setting up a national system for identification, approval and implementation of CDM-projects in China illustrates the changes in the Chinese attitude towards the CDM after COP7. This is a very important process, and the outcome could strongly influence investors' willingness to invest in Chinese CDM-projects. The massive interest and capacity building by international assistance organisations, bilateral and multilateral donors, for preparing the implementation of the CDM will provide China with information and experience. Nevertheless, potential factors that may negatively influence efficient implementation of CDM-projects are: the domestic implementation system is not yet finalised and may impact on China's ability to compete for CDM-projects; the priorities of the Chinese authorities may not match those of foreign investors; the main expertise regarding CDM is found in a few ministries and research institutes in Beijing, and there is a need to increase capacity for CDM among local project developers and authorities; most research carried out concerned technical issues, and there is a need to include economists and market experts in order to increase understanding of the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Tangen & G�rild Heggelund, 2003. "Will the Clean Development Mechanism be effectively implemented in China?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 303-307, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:3:y:2003:i:3:p:303-307
    DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2003.0335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3763/cpol.2003.0335
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3763/cpol.2003.0335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 1999. "Estimating the size of the potential market for all three flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol," MPRA Paper 13088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paula Castro, 2012. "Does the CDM discourage emission reduction targets in advanced developing countries?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 198-218, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2000. "Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 136(3), pages 491-521, September.
    2. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2010. "China in the transition to a low-carbon economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6638-6653, November.
    3. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2006. "Toward an effective implementation of clean development mechanism projects in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3691-3701, December.
    4. Haites, Erik & Missfeldt, Fanny, 2004. "Liquidity implications of a commitment period reserve at national and global levels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 845-868, September.
    5. Jotzo, Frank & Michaelowa, Axel, 2001. "Estimating the CDM Market Under the Bonn Agreement," Discussion Paper Series 26160, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    6. Dirk T.G. Rübbelke & Nathan Rive, 2008. "Effects of the CDM on Poverty Eradication and Global Climate Protection," Working Papers 2008.93, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2008. "Asian energy and environmental policy: Promoting growth while preserving the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3905-3924, October.
    8. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2000. "The size of the carbon market study: discussion," MPRA Paper 14507, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2002. "The economic effects of an alternative EU emissions policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 24(7-8), pages 667-677, November.
    10. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2001. "An economic assessment of the Kyoto Protocol using a global model based on the marginal abatement costs of 12 regions," MPRA Paper 13148, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Heleen de Coninck & Nico van der Linden, 2003. "Characteristics of Carbon Transactions. Joint Implementation, Clean Development Mechanisms and Emission Trading in Perspective," Energy & Environment, , vol. 14(5), pages 557-578, September.
    12. Jacob Werksman & Kevin Baumert & Navroz Dubash, 2003. "Will International Investment Rules Obstruct Climate Protection Policies? An Examination of the Clean Development Mechanism," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 59-86, March.
    13. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2004. "Meeting the Kyoto targets: the importance of developing country participation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 3-19, January.
    14. ZhongXiang Zhang, 2004. "The World Bank’s Prototype Carbon Fund and China," Working Papers 2004.138, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Frank Jotzo & Axel Michaelowa, 2002. "Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2-3), pages 179-196, September.
    16. Halsnaes, Kirsten, 2002. "Market potential for Kyoto mechanisms--estimation of global market potential for co-operative greenhouse gas emission reduction policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 13-32, January.
    17. Stevens, Brandt & Rose, Adam, 2002. "A Dynamic Analysis of the Marketable Permits Approach to Global Warming Policy: A Comparison of Spatial and Temporal Flexibility," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 45-69, July.
    18. Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2001. "An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 53-69, April.
    19. repec:dgr:rugccs:200013 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:3:y:2003:i:3:p:303-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.