Author
Listed:
- Heather McDiarmid
- Paul Parker
Abstract
Emissions reduction policies and programs should consider both the operational emissions reduction from single family home retrofits and the embodied emissions of the retrofit materials. This is because it can take 0.9–10.1 years before the emissions savings from building envelope upgrades in a gas-heated home equal the embodied emissions from the materials used. The wide range reflects the range of embodied emissions for different insulation and window replacement options. Heat pumps also have significant embodied emissions from their manufacture and from refrigerant leaks, but it takes less than two and a half years of operations in Ontario to offset the emissions investment relative to heating with a gas furnace. We recommend that Canada accelerate the phase out of insulation materials with high embodied emissions and increase incentives for window replacements. Programs and policies should also consider the age of the home and the potential energy savings when recommending building envelope improvements to maximize the total emission reduction potential. Finally, heat pumps should be promoted in all homes where low carbon electricity is available because this is the simplest and most effective way to reduce carbon emissions, especially when embodied emissions are considered.Key policy insights The embodied emissions from retrofits of single-family homes can be significant and should be considered in retrofit policy design.Canada and other countries should accelerate the phase out of high embodied emissions insulation materials.To maximize energy efficiency gains and minimize retrofit embodied emissions paybacks, building envelope upgrades should focus on older homes.Heat pumps remain a good climate investment in Ontario because the emissions from heat pump refrigerant leaks are offset by less than two and half years of operational emissions savings.
Suggested Citation
Heather McDiarmid & Paul Parker, 2025.
"Retrofitting homes in Ontario entails significant embodied emissions: new policies needed,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 388-400, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:388-400
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2390520
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:388-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.