IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v24y2024i9p1242-1258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are climate policies assessed in emerging economies? A study of ex-ante policy appraisal in Brazil, China, and India

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Qin
  • Cormac Lynch
  • Peter Barbrook-Johnson
  • Pablo Salas
  • Guanyu Yang
  • Michel Ferreira Cardia Haddad
  • Femke Nijsse
  • Roberto Pasqualino
  • Jean-François Mercure

Abstract

Effective mitigation of climate change requires a robust set of policy interventions. Existing policy appraisal frameworks and approaches impact the design and choice of these policy options. However, their application to transformative climate policy can present several shortcomings. In light of criticism around current appraisal methods, we review the climate policy appraisal landscape and interview policy experts in three major emerging economies: Brazil, China and India. Little research has been done on the perception, approach, and practice of policy appraisal in these countries, even though they will have a significant impact on global progress to mitigate climate change. We find that policy appraisal in Brazil, China, and India is supported by guidelines, but the detail and implementation of those guidelines vary significantly. Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is the prevailing decision-making framework in both Brazil and India whereas multi-criteria analysis is the dominant framework in China. Practitioners appear to understand CBA and its limitations well but also value its usability and the perception of robustness. Across all countries, political considerations can outweigh appraisal findings; respondents suggested this can be negative, in the sense that appraisal results are sometimes ignored, but can also be positive in the sense that other objectives are considered. Existing approaches present several limitations, particularly regarding transformational change, which could hamper progress to formulate and implement effective climate and energy policy.Guidelines that standardize the appraisal process are considered better for accountability and therefore increase the influence of appraisal in policymaking.The choice of approach affects the appraisal outcome. The type of policy and its intended aims should inform the method of appraisal used.Climate policies are often transformational in nature. As such, their outcomes can be very uncertain. More efforts are needed to integrate these considerations of uncertainty into appraisal frameworks.More computational models that consider system feedbacks and uncertainty are needed to robustly analyse the impacts of transformative policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Qin & Cormac Lynch & Peter Barbrook-Johnson & Pablo Salas & Guanyu Yang & Michel Ferreira Cardia Haddad & Femke Nijsse & Roberto Pasqualino & Jean-François Mercure, 2024. "How are climate policies assessed in emerging economies? A study of ex-ante policy appraisal in Brazil, China, and India," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1242-1258, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:9:p:1242-1258
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2283174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2023.2283174
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2023.2283174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:9:p:1242-1258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.