Author
Abstract
Companies are becoming ever more present actors in climate change governance and increasing numbers of mostly multinational companies are pledging to become greenhouse gas neutral, climate neutral, or to reach for net-zero emissions. This article deconstructs net-zero, greenhouse gas and climate neutrality targets of 51 chemical companies in Germany. A brief contextualization of companies as actors in climate change governance and an overview of the German chemical sector as an emission-intensive industry are given. Evaluation criteria for corporate greenhouse gas and climate neutrality targets are developed by comparing seven existing or emerging industry and non-governmental standards and guidelines for (corporate) net-zero, climate and greenhouse gas neutrality. The criteria are then applied to the climate and sustainability targets of 51 companies in the German chemical sector. Results show that the targets vary greatly in terms of their actual definition, the target year and covered emissions, the timeline and planned implementation measures. Only some companies underpin their targets with strategic decarbonization approaches while others rely heavily on offsetting their emissions. This heterogeneity highlights the need for unified assessment criteria and in-depth analysis of corporate climate strategies to rule out greenwashing. Recommendations for target definitions and minimum criteria are given.The field of corporate GHG and climate neutrality pledges has become complex, yet highly relevant for climate change governance and needs to be addressed by researchers and policymakers alike.Minimum criteria and unified assessment methods for corporate GHG and climate neutrality targets are needed to rule out greenwashing. The results accentuate the need for policymakers to develop such minimum criteria and unify definitions.
Suggested Citation
Franziska Riedel, 2024.
"Deconstructing corporate net-zero and climate neutrality targets in the German chemical industry,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1177-1194, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:9:p:1177-1194
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2376741
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:9:p:1177-1194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.