Author
Listed:
- Simon Bullock
- James Mason
- Alice Larkin
Abstract
International shipping is a major contributor to climate change. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has jurisdiction over the sector’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and in July 2023 agreed a revised climate change strategy, setting tightened targets for emissions reductions by 2030, 2040 and 2050. In this perspective article, we analyse the remaining carbon budgets available to the international shipping sector, to assess whether these new targets constitute a sufficient contribution to meeting the overarching Paris Agreement goal to limit global heating to 1.5°C. The new strategy sets both ‘indicative checkpoints’ and more ambitious ‘strive’ targets. Both represent a major advance over the previous strategy, however, only the ‘strive’ targets are compatible with the 1.5°C limit. The first ‘strive’ target is for 30% reductions by 2030, just seven years away. To meet this goal, it is imperative that the IMO, nation states and the shipping industry act immediately to accelerate deployment of known technologies and operational practices that improve energy efficiency and cut CO2 emissions in the existing fleet.The new IMO strategy represents a major improvement on the targets in the previous 2018 strategy.The ‘indicative checkpoint’ targets for 2030 and 2040 are not sufficient for a fair contribution from international shipping to meeting the Paris 1.5°C limit.Under generous assumptions, the ‘strive’ targets of 30% reductions by 2030 and 80% by 2040 are compatible with the 1.5°C limit. These should be considered a minimum level of ambition for the sector.Further delay would push compatibility with 1.5°C out of reach.It is imperative that policy makers and the industry focus on accelerated deployment of known technologies and practices to meet the ‘strive’ 30% goal by 2030.
Suggested Citation
Simon Bullock & James Mason & Alice Larkin, 2024.
"Are the IMO’s new targets for international shipping compatible with the Paris Climate Agreement?,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 963-968, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:7:p:963-968
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2293081
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:7:p:963-968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.