IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v23y2023i9p1197-1212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor-state dispute settlement: obstructing a just energy transition

Author

Listed:
  • Kyla Tienhaara
  • Rachel Thrasher
  • B. Alexander Simmons
  • Kevin P. Gallagher

Abstract

Governments that revoke licenses and permits or take other measures to restrict the development of oil and gas in their territory will face claims from investors for compensation. When investors are foreign, they can seek compensation for ‘lost future profits’ in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), even if they had not commenced production. ISDS cases are likely to obstruct a just transition by chilling supply-side climate measures and diverting public funds away from climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. Using a dataset of ISDS-protected assets in the upstream oil and gas sector, we demonstrate that the global distribution of legal and financial risks is highly unjust. More than two thirds of the net-present value of 1.5°C-incompatible and treaty-protected oil and gas assets are found in low- and middle-income countries, including those highly vulnerable to climate change. The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is the most significant single treaty obstructing the transition. While protection of fossil fuels in some countries may soon be phased-out of this treaty, the protection of the assets identified in our study will remain for at least ten more years. To limit ISDS risk, states should: (1) immediately cease the issuance of new permits/leases for oil and gas developments; (2) terminate investment treaties (including the ECT) and (3) develop binding rules that cap the amount of compensation that can be awarded to investors.Oil and gas investors protected by investment treaties can claim compensation for ‘lost future profits’ in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) when governments impose limits on production (supply-side climate policy).ISDS claims could absorb a significant amount of public finance that is needed for climate mitigation and adaptation, particularly in the Global South.The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) protects more upstream oil and gas assets than any other single treaty and is already being used to challenge climate action; recent efforts to modernize the treaty are insufficient.To limit the risk of ISDS claims, states should stop issuing permits for new oil and gas projects, terminate investment treaties and develop rules to cap the amount of compensation that can be awarded to investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyla Tienhaara & Rachel Thrasher & B. Alexander Simmons & Kevin P. Gallagher, 2023. "Investor-state dispute settlement: obstructing a just energy transition," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1197-1212, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:9:p:1197-1212
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2022.2153102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2022.2153102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2022.2153102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Bellak & Markus Leibrecht, 2024. "The (Political) Economics of Bilateral Investment Treaties—The Unique Trajectory of Brazil," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:9:p:1197-1212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.