Author
Listed:
- Arnaud Van Der Cam
- Ignace Adant
- Goedele Van den Broeck
Abstract
Personal carbon allowances (PCAs) can complement current carbon pricing policies to achieve the sharp cut in emissions needed to meet the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement. While their effectiveness crucially depends on their social acceptability, there is little evidence on which specific characteristics of their design are preferred by citizens and how these preferences might differ within a society. Our study aims at eliciting preferences for a specific PCA scheme and explores their heterogeneity, using a discrete choice experiment among Belgian citizens and analyzing mixed logit and latent class models. Discrete choice experiments are a widely used tool to deliver key insights to policy design, but have rarely been used in the context of a PCA design. We find that intergenerational differences are important factors to explain citizens’ willingness to accept a PCA, with younger people strongly in favour. A PCA that includes carbon price regulations and provides tailor-made advice on how to reduce carbon emissions, is more likely to be accepted. However, purchase limits for emission thresholds beyond which a tax is imposed should be carefully introduced, as we find large heterogeneity across citizens’ willingness to accept this. These differences are correlated with current emission and income levels, and awareness about PCA. Our study is a first step in designing and developing a PCA, as investigating its social acceptability is a prerequisite before actual implementation.Key policy insightsLarge intergenerational differences in the social acceptability of a PCA exist, with younger people strongly in favour.Carbon price regulations increase social acceptability, either through minimum and maximum prices or through a fixed price by experts.Provision of tailor-made advice to reduce personal carbon impact increases social acceptability.Introduction of purchase limits for emission thresholds, beyond which a tax is imposed, needs to be complemented by additional measures to ensure climate justice.
Suggested Citation
Arnaud Van Der Cam & Ignace Adant & Goedele Van den Broeck, 2023.
"The social acceptability of a personal carbon allowance: a discrete choice experiment in Belgium,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 859-871, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:7:p:859-871
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2183176
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:7:p:859-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.