Author
Listed:
- Diego Hidalgo-Oñate
- Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes
- J. David Cabedo
Abstract
Several major economies have already committed to achieving a carbon-neutral economy by 2050, in accordance with the Paris Agreement. The banking system in all countries has a key role to play in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy, and academia has been researching the prudential regulation tools that will enable the incorporation of climate risk management into banking. However, no studies to date have attempted to systematize research on Climate-related Prudential Regulation Tools. This study conducts a systematic review of the English-language peer-reviewed literature produced on this topic in the period since the 2007–2008 financial crisis, revealing the state of the art and the research gaps. The thematic synthesis carried out in this study shows the experience of some countries in the implementation of these tools and the advancement of academic knowledge in this field. These findings can serve as a reference for the further development of a harmonized international framework to address climate risk in banking.Central banks are considering sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) in their agenda to align national financial systems towards internationally-agreed climate goals.The academic research community is also investigating how to integrate climate risk into the prudential regulation tools available to financial regulators.A concentration of research in developed countries, mainly in Europe, and a significant increase in the publication of studies has been observed in recent years.Scientific research has focused on five prudential regulatory tools: disclosure requirements, climate-related stress testing, differentiated capital requirements, targeted refinancing lines, and green finance guides and frameworks.Research gaps identified include green bubble, double materiality, interaction between policies, compound risks, banking governance, and small and medium-size enterprize (SME) banking. They are cross-cutting issues that could increase the body of knowledge on climate-related prudential regulation tools.
Suggested Citation
Diego Hidalgo-Oñate & Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes & J. David Cabedo, 2023.
"Climate-related prudential regulation tools in the context of sustainable and responsible investment: a systematic review,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 704-721, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:6:p:704-721
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2179587
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:6:p:704-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.