Author
Listed:
- Patrick Plötz
- Jakob Wachsmuth
- Frances Sprei
- Till Gnann
- Daniel Speth
- Felix Neuner
- Steffen Link
Abstract
Following the Paris Agreement, virtually all countries worldwide have committed themselves to undertaking efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 °C. Within the European Union (EU), the recent ‘Fit for 55’ policy package proposes ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies for all sectors as part of the EU's contribution to limiting global warming. Yet, it is unclear whether the proposed policies are sufficient for the EU to limit global warming to 1.5 °C and it remains an open policy problem how to translate global temperature targets into sector-specific emission budgets and further into sector-specific policies. Here, we derive GHG budgets for transport in EU27 and obtain GHG mitigation pathways for Europe consistent with 1.5 °C global warming. We do not provide a comprehensive assessment of the ‘Fit for 55’ transport package but we discuss the main policies for road transport in light of the GHG emission budgets, their level of ambition, and suggest amendments to these policies as well as improvements to the ‘Fit for 55’ package. Our results suggest that parts of the ‘Fit for 55’ for transport are still not ambitious enough to align with a 1.5 °C scenario.Key policy insights A Paris-compatible residual carbon budget for EU transport is 10–12 Gt CO2.The budget implies net zero emissions for EU transport by 2044–2048 latest.We find the current ‘Fit for 55’ proposal for transport is not ambitious enough.A faster phase-out of cars and trucks with combustion engines is required and there is a need for ambitious standards for fast charging e-vehicles.CO2 pricing of transport is not a substitute but a complement to fleet targets.
Suggested Citation
Patrick Plötz & Jakob Wachsmuth & Frances Sprei & Till Gnann & Daniel Speth & Felix Neuner & Steffen Link, 2023.
"Greenhouse gas emission budgets and policies for zero-Carbon road transport in Europe,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 343-354, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:343-354
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2185585
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:343-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.