Author
Listed:
- Simone Abram
- Ed Atkins
- Alix Dietzel
- Kirsten Jenkins
- Lorna Kiamba
- Joshua Kirshner
- Julia Kreienkamp
- Karen Parkhill
- Tom Pegram
- Lara M. Santos Ayllón
Abstract
Transition to a post-carbon economy implies changes that are both far-reaching and unprecedented. The notion that a decarbonization transition must encompass multiple forms of justice is gaining ground. In response, the concept of Just Transition has become ever more popular – and confusion about its meaning ever greater. We argue in this paper that the term Just Transition needs a rigorous updating to develop its full conceptual power for the analysis and evaluation of the rapid and extensive energy transitions already underway. After reviewing the different uses of Just Transition in practice and scholarship, we propose that the term be used as an analytical concept for an ongoing process of transition. The Just Transition concept can provide an integrated, whole-system perspective on justice (procedural, distributive, recognition, and restorative) that can help in identifying systemic solutions to address environmental and socio-economic concerns. This would differ from reductionist approaches that derive from legacy silo-sectoral or technologically driven approaches; these too often overlook negative side-effects and wider justice implications of reorganizing economic practice. An examination of COVID-19 pandemic responses illustrates our operationalization of the Just Transition concept, highlighting the importance of designing whole-system policies that are equitable, as well as the pitfalls of pursuing a narrow sectoral approach. Taking seriously the implications of complex systems with hard-to-predict effects also has concrete implications for policy interventions at all levels of governance. In particular, we highlight the importance of attending to multiple social inequalities for ensuring the resilience of whole-system decarbonization in the face of instability, unpredictability, and unprecedented change.Key policy insightsThe transition to net-zero will be neither sustainable nor credible if it creates or worsens social inequalities; a backlash is likely if the transition is not perceived to be just.Pathways forward may only emerge through observation, experimentation, and experience.A range of policy tools exist to address Just Transition concerns. These include addressing social and environmental aspects of economic policy; making sure that interventions are adapted to local contexts; building democratic engagement platforms; and open and transparent communication.Job creation does not guarantee just outcomes, as justice goes beyond employment conditions.
Suggested Citation
Simone Abram & Ed Atkins & Alix Dietzel & Kirsten Jenkins & Lorna Kiamba & Joshua Kirshner & Julia Kreienkamp & Karen Parkhill & Tom Pegram & Lara M. Santos Ayllón, 2022.
"Just Transition: A whole-systems approach to decarbonisation,"
Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1033-1049, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:8:p:1033-1049
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2022.2108365
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Jan Frankowski & Joanna Mazurkiewicz & Jakub Sokołowski, 2022.
"Mapping the indirect employment of hard coal mining: a case study of Upper Silesia, Poland,"
IBS Working Papers
07/2022, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
- Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2024.
"Demonstrating the need for a just transition: Socioeconomic diagnosis of polish cities living on hard coal mining,"
Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
- Hosan, Shahadat & Sen, Kanchan Kumar & Rahman, Md Matiar & Chapman, Andrew J. & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Alam, Mohammad Jahangir & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2024.
"Energy innovation funding and social equity: Mediating role of just energy transition,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:8:p:1033-1049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.