IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v20y2020i6p758-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loss and damage: an opportunity for transformation?

Author

Listed:
  • Erin Roberts
  • Mark Pelling

Abstract

As observed and predicted losses and damages from climate change impacts grow increasingly severe, calls for transformation as a response to long-term climate change have become more frequent. Transformational approaches have also been integrated into the global climate change regime under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as part of the workplan of the Executive Committee guiding the implementation of the Warsaw international mechanism, the oversight body on loss and damage. However, there has as yet been no attempt to define what is meant by transformation in the context of loss and damage. This paper attempts to clarify the burgeoning academic and policy literature by positing three types of transformation as a response to loss and damage: transformation as adaptation (an intensification of dominant socio-ecological relationships), transformation as extension (when the limits of established adaptive capacity are reached) and transformation as liberation (adopting development pathways that address the root causes of vulnerability). Transformation as liberation is proposed as a deeper change to social-technological systems to avoid and minimize loss and damage in ways that enhance social justice and sustainability. To provide the kind of information decision makers need to plan and implement transformation as liberation, more research is needed on how to plan in a way that ensures the most equitable outcomes.Key policy insights Loss and Damage is an opportunity to scrutinize and address the root causes of vulnerability.Framing climate change as a development crisis will allow opportunities for transformation as liberation to emerge.Transformation as liberation to address the root causes of vulnerability requires meaningful engagement with processes at all levels.A new model of global governance is needed in which global equity is a moral imperative.The transition to transformation as liberation must be just, which requires leadership, inclusive and participatory decision making and building alliances.The global Loss and Damage agenda could open up space for a broader discussion on how transformation as liberation can be facilitated to address inequalities both between and within countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin Roberts & Mark Pelling, 2020. "Loss and damage: an opportunity for transformation?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 758-771, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:20:y:2020:i:6:p:758-771
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1680336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2019.1680336
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2019.1680336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katy Davis & James D. Ford & Claire H. Quinn & Anuszka Mosurska & Melanie Flynn & IHACC Research Team & Sherilee L. Harper, 2022. "Shifting Safeties and Mobilities on the Land in Arctic North America: A Systematic Approach to Identifying the Root Causes of Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Sumya Naz & Tasin Islam Himel & Taufiqur Rafi & Sazzadul Islam & Saleha Bushra Neha & Syeda Tabassum Islam & Md Mahmud Hasan & Nur Mohammad Ha-Mim & Md. Zakir Hossain & Khan Rubayet Rahaman, 2024. "Investigating Loss and Damage in Coastal Region of Bangladesh from Migration as Adaptation Perspective: A Qualitative Study from Khulna and Satkhira District," World, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Aysun Aygün Oğur & Tüzin Baycan, 2022. "Identifying priority planning areas of Istanbul for climate change preparedness," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 283-306, February.
    4. Tschakert, Petra & Parsons, Meg & Atkins, Ed & Garcia, Alicea & Godden, Naomi & Gonda, Noemi & Henrique, Karen Paiva & Sallu, Susannah & Steen, Karin & Ziervogel, Gina, 2023. "Methodological lessons for negotiating power, political capabilities, and resilience in research on climate change responses," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:20:y:2020:i:6:p:758-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.