IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v17y2017i2p203-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing progress in MRV capacity development: experience with a scorecard approach

Author

Listed:
  • Till Neeff
  • Zoltán Somogyi
  • Corinna Schultheis
  • Esther Mertens
  • Joachim Rock
  • Johannes Brötz
  • Karsten Dunger
  • Katja Oehmichen
  • Sandro Federici

Abstract

This article reports experiences gathered in 12 developing countries in Latin America and Africa with capacity development for national GHG inventory systems. The national systems and their ability to deliver on measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) requirements is assessed using a scorecard that covers the transparency, accuracy, completeness, consistency, and comparability of the GHG inventory as well as its institutional set-up and management aspects. The analysis shows that a quantitative assessment of GHG inventory systems with a scorecard is feasible and useful, and could commonly be used for tracking progress in MRV capacity development.Policy relevanceA large number of capacity development initiatives are underway to advance national GHG inventory systems in developing countries, particularly in the land-use sector. These aim to promote the reliable MRV of GHG emissions and removals, which is expected to underpin developing countries’ contributions to global mitigation efforts, including through results-based payments. Although MRV is a cornerstone of climate change policy and despite widespread capacity gaps, there is little conclusive evidence about the effectiveness of such capacity development. This article relates the positive experience from one initiative, the Capacity Development for REDD+ project, which employed a novel, scorecard-based approach to results monitoring. Considerable progress is observed and provides reassurance regarding the soundness of development agencies’ significant investments in MRV. Disaggregating scores by countries and by underlying criteria also provides insights to prioritize further investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Till Neeff & Zoltán Somogyi & Corinna Schultheis & Esther Mertens & Joachim Rock & Johannes Brötz & Karsten Dunger & Katja Oehmichen & Sandro Federici, 2017. "Assessing progress in MRV capacity development: experience with a scorecard approach," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 203-212, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:203-212
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1075375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075375
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neeff, Till & Piazza, Marco, 2020. "How countries link forest monitoring into policy-making," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:203-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.