IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v44y2025i4p656-675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of fair information practices on ad effectiveness among Chinese consumers: trust transfer across contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Junjun Cheng
  • Zihang Huang

Abstract

In response to growing privacy concern among global online consumers, platform companies may follow principles of fair information practices (FIPs) to foster consumer trust, which subsequently shapes the effectiveness of digital ads displayed by the platform. However, the connection between FIPs and advertising perceptions remains underresearched in existing literature. By establishing and testing a dual context framework that integrates theories of procedural fairness, trust transfer and regulatory focus, this study investigates the psychological mechanism driving the effects of FIPs on targeted ads. The results show that FIPs arouse consumers’ platform trust via perceived fairness, followed by a transference of trust from the platform to the ads, thereby amplifying positive responses to targeted ads. Whereas privacy concern is reduced by platform trust, its hypothesised effects on ad effectiveness were not supported. Our findings underscore a cross-context trust transference embedded in social platforms for advertising, whereby trust enhancement (relative to privacy concern reduction) directly boosts ad perceptions, thus, offering valuable insights on the practices of digital platform managers and e-marketers.

Suggested Citation

  • Junjun Cheng & Zihang Huang, 2025. "The effects of fair information practices on ad effectiveness among Chinese consumers: trust transfer across contexts," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 656-675, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:656-675
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2333928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2333928
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2333928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:44:y:2025:i:4:p:656-675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.