IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v43y2024i9p1827-1841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering the role of optimism bias in social media phishing: an empirical study on TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Lei
  • Siqi Hu
  • Carol Hsu

Abstract

Driven by the rapid growth and prevalent use of social media, social media phishing has become an increasingly serious threat due to its wide-ranging disruptive potential. Researchers believe that optimism bias – where one tends to judge his or her own chance of experiencing a negative event to be lower than that of others – can partly explain the discrepancies between one’s knowledge about threats and the actual behaviours taken to mitigate such threats. Therefore, the current study sought to explore social media phishing from the perspective of optimism bias. More specifically, we focused on a demonstration of optimism bias regarding being phished on social media, what leads to this bias, and the extent to which it ultimately influences users’ intention to take preventive measures against social media phishing. The results showed that individuals displayed optimism bias of being phished on TikTok, that perceived controllability over phishing on TikTok increased optimism bias, and that TikTok addiction reduced optimism bias. While optimism bias had no effect on the intention to take preventive measures against social media phishing on TikTok, information security awareness exerted a positive effect on this intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Lei & Siqi Hu & Carol Hsu, 2024. "Uncovering the role of optimism bias in social media phishing: an empirical study on TikTok," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1827-1841, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:9:p:1827-1841
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2230305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2230305
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2230305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:9:p:1827-1841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.