Author
Listed:
- Eetu Wallius
- Ana Carolina Tomé Klock
- Juho Hamari
Abstract
The commonly applied strategies for promoting policy compliance can be coercive, potentially hindering behavioural change and discouraging individuals from taking a proactive role in their social settings. These approaches also pose risks related to ethics as they may sacrifice individual agency and autonomy. However, contemporary motivational strategies may provide solutions to these conundrums. One of the prominent approaches is gamification, which aims to foster engagement and intrinsic motivation by using game-like design. Despite increasing interest, the corpus on gamification is yet to comprehensively investigate its effects on policy compliance and proactive citizen behaviours. Therefore, this study examines the relationships between gamification design types, gameful experience, policy compliance and safety citizenship behaviour in the social distancing context (during COVID-19) using a vignette-based online experiment (n = 937). Based on the results, gamification supports policy compliance and safety citizenship behaviour. The results further indicate that the effect of gamification is mediated by the engaging gameful experience it creates, and adds granularity by showing the differential effects of achievement and progression-based, competitive, and immersive designs. The findings provide evidence of gamification’s potential as a non-coercive method of helping people follow policies while encouraging a proactive citizen role.
Suggested Citation
Eetu Wallius & Ana Carolina Tomé Klock & Juho Hamari, 2024.
"From forceful compliance to motivated endorsement: effects of gamification on policy compliance during COVID-19,"
Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15), pages 3657-3675, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:15:p:3657-3675
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2286344
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:15:p:3657-3675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.