IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v43y2024i13p3271-3287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media use, social bot literacy, perceived threats from bots, and perceived bot control: a moderated-mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Fang
  • Chen Nie

Abstract

The rapid development and widespread presence of social bots online has been transforming users’ online news environment. This study adopts a human-centered perspective to investigate the impact of individuals’ social media usage experiences on their social bot literacy, perception of threats posed from bots, and perceived social bot control within the context of China. We collected data from surveying 1159 Sina Weibo users and conducting interviews among 20 participants. The data were used to examine (1) the relationship between social media use and social bot literacy and perceived bot control, (2) the mediating role of social bot literacy between social media use and perceived bot control, and (3) the moderating role of perceived threat from bots in this relationship. The results of the analysis suggested a significant moderated mediation model in which social bot literacy mediated the correlation between social media use and perceived bot control and individuals’ perceived threat further moderated this relationship. Specifically, for those with a higher level of perceived threat, their indirect effect of social media use was lower compared to those with a lower level of perceived threat from bots.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Fang & Chen Nie, 2024. "Social media use, social bot literacy, perceived threats from bots, and perceived bot control: a moderated-mediation model," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(13), pages 3271-3287, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:13:p:3271-3287
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2276801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2276801
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2276801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:13:p:3271-3287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.