IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v43y2024i10p1990-2006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are we different? Analyzing the role of algorithmic curation and algorithmic literacy during online shopping from a gender differences perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu
  • Dan Wu
  • Qingyue Guo

Abstract

In the traditional stereotype that continues to this day, female users are naturally considered to be more disadvantaged in technology. As algorithmic curation becomes more prevalent in daily life, do gender-specific users adapt differently? Research on gender differences in this new technological environment is needed to prevent bias from traditional stereotypes. To this end, this study conducted 40 semi-structured interviews (20 males, 20 females) to explore: (1) How do male and female users interact with algorithmic curation? (2) How does algorithmic literacy affect users’ interactions with algorithmic curation, and are there gender differences in this interaction? By applying qualitative content analysis, we found no significant gender differences overall, with female users showing slightly higher algorithmic literacy and better coping with algorithmic information curation. However, upon conducting specific comparisons, we still identified certain gender differences in the effects of algorithmic curation, which can offer insights for developing strategies to improve algorithmic literacy and stimulate algorithmic engagement among users of different genders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Dan Wu & Qingyue Guo, 2024. "Are we different? Analyzing the role of algorithmic curation and algorithmic literacy during online shopping from a gender differences perspective," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 1990-2006, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:10:p:1990-2006
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2237602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2237602
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2237602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:43:y:2024:i:10:p:1990-2006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.