Author
Listed:
- Eui Dong Kim
- Kevin K.Y. Kuan
- Milan Rasikbhai Vaghasiya
- Jonathan Penm
- Naren Gunja
- Redouane El Amrani
- Simon K. Poon
Abstract
Purpose –This study attempts to understand the factors that influence clinician resistance to the implementation of health information technology in a mandatory setting.Design/methodology/approach –A survey study was conducted with 202 clinicians regarding their perceptions of the implementation of electronic medication management systems (eMMS) in an Australian hospital. The data was collected during the initial roll-out of eMMS for model validation and quantitative analysis.Findings –The overall results indicated that performance expectancy, switching costs, and facilitating conditions are direct predictors of clinician resistance, whereas effort expectancy and social influence showed indirect effects on clinician resistance through performance expectancy or switching costs.Theoretical implications –The study is among the first study that investigates passive clinician resistance to the implementation of health information technology in a health organisation. This study also focused on opposition behaviour among under-examined degrees of resistance.Practical implications –This study provides some insights to the hospital management on how to mitigate clinician resistance in the implementation of health information technology.Research limitations/Future directions –Other types of clinician resistance, such as postponement and rejection, are not examined in this study. Future research on postponement behaviour and rejection behaviour is needed to have a more comprehensive view of clinician resistance.
Suggested Citation
Eui Dong Kim & Kevin K.Y. Kuan & Milan Rasikbhai Vaghasiya & Jonathan Penm & Naren Gunja & Redouane El Amrani & Simon K. Poon, 2023.
"Passive resistance to health information technology implementation: the case of electronic medication management system,"
Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(13), pages 2308-2329, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:42:y:2023:i:13:p:2308-2329
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2117081
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:42:y:2023:i:13:p:2308-2329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.