IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v41y2022i12p2635-2653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an understanding of the decision process of solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing contests for problem solving

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefeng Zhang
  • Qian Chen

Abstract

Solvers’ participation is essential for successful implementation of crowdsourcing contests for problem solving (CCPS). Many efforts have been made to investigate solvers’ various participation behaviours in CCPS. Whether or not a solver will conduct a behaviour is the result of decision making. However, to our knowledge, few studies concentrated on solvers’ participation from a decision process perspective and little is known about the factors that influence the decisions that solvers are likely to make. This study aims to develop a framework for demonstrating solvers’ decisions and their relations, thereafter identify the factors that affect each of decision makings. It does so through the qualitative structured interviews conducted with solvers in a crowdsourcing platform. The interviews capture four major interrelated solvers’ decisions that are decisions of participation in CCPS, platform selection, contest selection and determination of effort level, respectively. Moreover, the factors including solvers’ motives, solvers’ individual characteristics and incentives, and their roles in each of solvers’ decision makings are presented. The findings improve the understanding of solvers’ participation in CCPS from a decision process perspective. With the further comprehending of factors that affect solvers’ decision makings, this study provides practical implications for crowdsourcing platforms to improve their services for solvers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefeng Zhang & Qian Chen, 2022. "Towards an understanding of the decision process of solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing contests for problem solving," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(12), pages 2635-2653, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:41:y:2022:i:12:p:2635-2653
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1941258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1941258
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1941258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:41:y:2022:i:12:p:2635-2653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.