IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v40y2021i14p1544-1563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do conversational case-based reasoning systems interact with their users: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Hillig
  • Romy Müller

Abstract

Conversational case-based reasoning (CCBR) systems retrieve past cases that are similar to a current problem by eliciting situation descriptions in interactive dialogues with their users. To find out how such human-machine cooperation is put into practice, the present article reviews the CCBR literature and extracts a list of dialogue principles – interaction techniques by means of which CCBR systems communicate with their users. Seven dialogue principles are identified and explained: mixed initiative, question selection and ordering, dealing with abstraction and expertise, explanations, visualisation and highlighting, dialogue termination, and evaluation support. The results reveal that current CCBR systems already make great efforts to put user needs into the centre of the interaction. At the same time, the current implementation of dialogue principles that adjust CCBR systems to user needs raise questions about who should be in control of these adjustments, what levels of human-computer interaction should be adjusted, and what goals should guide adjustment decisions. Moreover, the present review highlights a number of limitations concerning the methodology and contents of CCBR research, and points out questions for future research on human-computer interaction in CCBR systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Hillig & Romy Müller, 2021. "How do conversational case-based reasoning systems interact with their users: a literature review," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(14), pages 1544-1563, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:14:p:1544-1563
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1767207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1767207
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1767207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:14:p:1544-1563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.