IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v40y2021i14p1516-1527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How rude is rude: an exploratory study among Australian Millennials, Generation ‘X’ and Baby Boomers mobile phone users

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer (M.I) Loh
  • Jane Strachan
  • Raechel Johns

Abstract

Research in both Organizational Behavior and Organizational Psychology has found that incivility via mobile phone technology has reached pandemic proportions in our contemporary society with significant negative impacts including poor physical and mental health. Porath and Pearson’s incivility spiral theory posits that the low intensity nature of incivility does not exclude it from becoming a precursors of workplace violence, aggression, harassment and conflict. In fact, incivility has become even more prevalent through the advancement of technology (i.e. mobile phone), increased global interactions and cultural diversity. Despite this, there is limited understanding on the antecedents of mobile phone incivility and whether different generations of Australian mobile users perceived incivility on the phone differently. To address this gap, participants from Generation ‘Y’(Millennials), Generation ‘X’ and Baby Boomers were recruited through snowball sampling and interviewed qualitatively about their lived experiences of mobile phone incivility. Using an Interpretative Phenomenological Approach (IPA), five main themes were identified. Results also indicated that Baby Boomers and Generation ‘X’ tend to be less tolerant of technological incivility than Millennials. This suggests potential intergenerational differences among different generations of Australians, resulting in negative interpersonal interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer (M.I) Loh & Jane Strachan & Raechel Johns, 2021. "How rude is rude: an exploratory study among Australian Millennials, Generation ‘X’ and Baby Boomers mobile phone users," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(14), pages 1516-1527, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:14:p:1516-1527
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1764106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1764106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1764106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:14:p:1516-1527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.