IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v40y2021i12p1310-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of immersive virtual reality for industrial skills training

Author

Listed:
  • Unnikrishnan Radhakrishnan
  • Konstantinos Koumaditis
  • Francesco Chinello

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) training offers the capability to industrial workers to acquire skills and address complex tasks by immersing them in a safe and controlled virtual environment. Immersive VR (IVR) training is adopted in many diverse settings, yet little systematic work currently exists on how researchers have applied it for industrial skills training and if it holds the potential to be applied remotely. In this review, 78 representative studies were analysed to answer three key questions: Is IVR an effective training method for industrial skills training? How is research in this field applied? And how can we make IVR training more effective and applicable for remote training? We can testify that IVR is a promising training method with high effectiveness scores. However, our analysis has uncovered several gaps in the application of IVR training, like the lack of learning theories in the design process and limited metrics beyond time and scores. Additionally, our review also exposed unexplored but intriguing avenues of research, like the utilisation of biosensors for users’ data collection, haptics that increases realism and applications with remote training potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Unnikrishnan Radhakrishnan & Konstantinos Koumaditis & Francesco Chinello, 2021. "A systematic review of immersive virtual reality for industrial skills training," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 1310-1339, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:12:p:1310-1339
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1954693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1954693
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1954693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:40:y:2021:i:12:p:1310-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.