IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v39y2020i1p47-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing trade-offs in frameworks for the design of smart environments

Author

Listed:
  • Carmelo Ardito
  • Giuseppe Desolda
  • Rosa Lanzilotti
  • Alessio Malizia
  • Maristella Matera

Abstract

Smart Interactive Experiences (SIEs) are usage situations enabled by the Internet of Things that empower users to interact with the surrounding environment. The goal of our research is to define methodologies and software environments to support the design of SIEs; more specifically, we focus on design paradigms suitable for experts of given domains, who however might not be experts in technology. In this context, this paper discusses some trade-offs that we identified between six different dimensions that characterise the quality of software environments for SIE design. The trade-offs emerged from the analysis of data collected in an experimental study that compared three different design paradigms to understand in which measure each paradigm supports the creative process for SIE design. After reporting on the study procedure and the data analyses, the paper illustrates how the resulting trade-offs led us to identify alternatives for SIE design paradigms, and to structure on their basis a modular architecture of a software platform where the strengths of the three paradigms can be exploited flexibly, i.e. depending on the constraints and the requirements characterising specific design situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmelo Ardito & Giuseppe Desolda & Rosa Lanzilotti & Alessio Malizia & Maristella Matera, 2020. "Analysing trade-offs in frameworks for the design of smart environments," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-71, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:1:p:47-71
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1634760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1634760
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1634760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:1:p:47-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.