IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v39y2020i12p1320-1340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User misrepresentation in online social networks: how competition and altruism impact online disclosure behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell Church
  • Ravi Thambusamy
  • Hamid Nemati

Abstract

Their sheer size and scale give social networks significant potential for shaping popular opinions. While the spread of information and influence within social networks has been popular area of research for some time, more recently a research trend has appeared in which the researcher seeks to understand how users can aggressively influence community opinions, often using misrepresented or false information. Such misrepresentations by users are deeply troubling for any social network, where revenue-generation and their reputation depend on accurate and reliable user generated information. This study investigates the individual motivations that both promote and inhibit intentions towards personal information misrepresentation. These motivations are hypothesised to result from the dichotomy of competitive and altruistic attitudes existing with social network communities. Results of a survey analysis involving 502 users of Facebook offer insights useful for understanding social network information sharing practices. Marketing strategies, in particular, should benefit from the careful evaluation of the factors that lead to honesty (or dishonesty) among OSN users.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell Church & Ravi Thambusamy & Hamid Nemati, 2020. "User misrepresentation in online social networks: how competition and altruism impact online disclosure behaviours," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(12), pages 1320-1340, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:12:p:1320-1340
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1667440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1667440
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1667440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:39:y:2020:i:12:p:1320-1340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.