IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v38y2019i8p782-795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing observer preferences when presenting a product in a rendered scene: 2D vs. autostereoscopic 3D displays

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Felip
  • Elena Mulet
  • Julia Galán
  • Inmaculada Remolar

Abstract

This research compares the way the image of a product included within a rendered scene shown on an autostereoscopic 3D display is rated versus the same image shown in a 2D display. The purpose is to understand the observer's preferences and to determine the features that a composition should have to highlight the product and to make its presentation more attractive to observers, thereby helping designers and advertisers who use both displays to prepare images to make them more effective when visually presenting a product.The results show that observers like the images on autostereoscopic 3D displays slightly more than those presented by means of 2D displays. On both displays the product is perceived more quickly when it is larger than the other elements and is shown with greater chromatic contrast, but a composition is seen as more attractive when the chromatic relationship between all the elements is more harmonious.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Felip & Elena Mulet & Julia Galán & Inmaculada Remolar, 2019. "Analysing observer preferences when presenting a product in a rendered scene: 2D vs. autostereoscopic 3D displays," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 782-795, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:8:p:782-795
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1554091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1554091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1554091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:8:p:782-795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.