IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v38y2019i4p319-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstructing persuasiveness of strategies in behaviour change systems using the ARCS model of motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Orji
  • Derek Reilly
  • Kiemute Oyibo
  • Fidelia A. Orji

Abstract

Persuasive technologies (PTs) motivate behaviour change using various persuasive strategies. However, there is still a dearth of knowledge on how PTs motivate behaviour change and how to design systems to increase their persuasiveness. To provide empirical insight into the mechanism through which PTs persuade, we conducted a large-scale study with 543 participants to investigate the relation between Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction constructs from the ARCS model of motivation and 10 strategies that are commonly used in persuasive systems design. Our results show that the ARCS constructs collectively explain between 82% and 91% of the variance in persuasiveness across the ten strategies. Relevance, followed by Attention, has the strongest association with persuasiveness. The result generalises across gender groups. Therefore, to increase a system’s persuasiveness, designers should focus on designing to increase relevance and to capture user’s attention, while also promoting confidence and a feeling of satisfaction. We contribute to Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) and Persuasive Technology by offering design guidelines for PTs to increase their persuasiveness and hence efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Orji & Derek Reilly & Kiemute Oyibo & Fidelia A. Orji, 2019. "Deconstructing persuasiveness of strategies in behaviour change systems using the ARCS model of motivation," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 319-335, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:4:p:319-335
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1520302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1520302
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1520302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:4:p:319-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.