Author
Listed:
- Benjamin R. Subhani
- Oluwademilade I. Amos-Oluwole
- Harry L. Claxton
- Daisy C. Holmes
- Carina E. I. Westling
- Harry J. Witchel
Abstract
Mind wandering is a commonly intruding cognitive state that leads to diminished performance and increased error risk during a primary task. A controversy over whether easier or more difficult tasks increase mind wandering has led to mind wandering being proposed as two different states: deliberate and spontaneous. We hypothesise that forced engagement via persistent compliant activity may both increase responsiveness and inhibit non-instrumental activities including deliberate mind wandering. Twenty-eight healthy adults interacted with 2 pairs of stimuli, each pair having one low-interactivity version and a high-interactivity version requiring compliant activity. Mind wandering was assessed by thought probes, and subjective responses were rated using visual analogue scales. Reaction times were measured using Superlab. Compliant activity decreased the prevalence of deliberate mind wandering episodes but not of overall mind wandering. Thought probe durations were accelerated significantly by compliant activity, near-significantly by thinking on-task thoughts, and additively by the combination of both. Deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering elicited equivalent thought probe durations. We conclude that compliant activity works synergistically with lack of mind wandering to accelerate the difficult task of thought probe response but not simple reaction times. These results fit with an arousal model but not the attentional resources model.
Suggested Citation
Benjamin R. Subhani & Oluwademilade I. Amos-Oluwole & Harry L. Claxton & Daisy C. Holmes & Carina E. I. Westling & Harry J. Witchel, 2019.
"Compliant activity rather than difficulty accelerates thought probe responsiveness and inhibits deliberate mind wandering,"
Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1048-1059, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:10:p:1048-1059
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1655095
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:38:y:2019:i:10:p:1048-1059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.