IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v36y2017i1p54-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playing ‘catch up’ with blended learning: performance impacts of augmenting classroom instruction with online learning

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Hill
  • Laku Chidambaram
  • Jama D. Summers

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of blended learning – an approach that combines in-class and online methods in a way that leverages the strengths of both – using a field experiment spanning 16 weeks. An information-processing model of learning suggests that learners will weigh the cost of information accessibility against its value in ways that will impact their interactions with the available information sources, which will consequently affect learning outcomes. Results of our study suggest that such an assessment did indeed occur and that it impacted learning performance. Specifically, our results support the idea that providing high-value content in both settings – the classroom (rich, yet high cost) and online (efficient, yet low cost), enhances performance. The largest gains in performance were seen by those who used the blended learning system the most, with the lowest gains by those who did not use the system at all (i.e. the control group).

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Hill & Laku Chidambaram & Jama D. Summers, 2017. "Playing ‘catch up’ with blended learning: performance impacts of augmenting classroom instruction with online learning," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 54-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:1:p:54-62
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1189964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1189964
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1189964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:36:y:2017:i:1:p:54-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.