IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v33y2014i9p919-928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the effects of sound masking on the use of audio CAPTCHAs

Author

Listed:
  • Abiodun Olalere
  • Jinjuan Heidi Feng
  • Jonathan Lazar
  • Tim Brooks

Abstract

The SoundsRight Audio Completely Automated Public Turing tests to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) was developed with the goal of providing a usable and secure audio CAPTCHA for people with visual impairments. Its design requires users to repeatedly identify a specific sound from a group of different sounds (e.g. baby crying and bird chirping) in real time. Adding background noise (sound masks) to the sounds may make it more difficult for automated software to recognise the sounds and therefore, improve security. However, the sound masks may also make it more challenging for human users to recognise the sound. We conducted a user study involving 20 blind participants and 20 sighted participants to investigate the effect of sound masks on the usability of the SoundsRight CAPTCHA. The results suggest that sound masks do have a significant impact on the failure rate and response time. Sighted participants had significantly a higher failure rate than blind participants and were more vulnerable to the negative effect of sound masks.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiodun Olalere & Jinjuan Heidi Feng & Jonathan Lazar & Tim Brooks, 2014. "Investigating the effects of sound masking on the use of audio CAPTCHAs," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(9), pages 919-928, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:9:p:919-928
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2014.898793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2014.898793
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2014.898793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:9:p:919-928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.