IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tbitxx/v33y2014i11p1136-1147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a contingency approach with whitelist- and blacklist-based anti-phishing applications: what do usability tests indicate?

Author

Listed:
  • Linfeng Li
  • Eleni Berki
  • Marko Helenius
  • Saila Ovaska

Abstract

In web browsers, a variety of anti-phishing tools and technologies are available to assist users to identify phishing attempts and potentially harmful pages. Such anti-phishing tools and technologies provide Internet users with essential information, such as warnings of spoofed pages. To determine how well users are able to recognise and identify phishing web pages with anti-phishing tools, we designed and conducted usability tests for two types of phishing-detection applications: blacklist-based and whitelist-based anti-phishing toolbars. The research results mainly indicate no significant performance differences between the application types. We also observed that, in many web browsing cases, a significant amount of useful and practical information for users is absent, such as information explaining professional web page security certificates. Such certificates are crucial in ensuring user privacy and protection. We also found other deficiencies in web identities in web pages and web browsers that present challenges to the design of anti-phishing toolbars. These challenges will require more professional, illustrative, instructional, and reliable information for users to facilitate user verification of the authenticity of web pages and their content.

Suggested Citation

  • Linfeng Li & Eleni Berki & Marko Helenius & Saila Ovaska, 2014. "Towards a contingency approach with whitelist- and blacklist-based anti-phishing applications: what do usability tests indicate?," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(11), pages 1136-1147, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:11:p:1136-1147
    DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.875221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2013.875221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144929X.2013.875221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:11:p:1136-1147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tbit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.