IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/specan/v15y2020i4p359-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I come to bury (population) growth, not to praise it

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel S. Franklin

Abstract

This paper reflects on regional perspectives in a post-growth world, taking the case of population loss as an example. Building on existing knowledge and illustrating with descriptive examples, three aspects of population loss that bear further study are highlighted: its ubiquity, dynamism and geography. The paper closes by emphasizing the importance of researching, thinking about and engaging with population loss to contribute to our understanding of a world of less, not more.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel S. Franklin, 2020. "I come to bury (population) growth, not to praise it," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 359-373, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:359-373
    DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2020.1802056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17421772.2020.1802056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17421772.2020.1802056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danny MacKinnon & Louise Kempton & Peter O’Brien & Emma Ormerod & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2022. "Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places [The shadow of the Pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 39-56.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:359-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RSEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.