IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/specan/v12y2017i2-3p326-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of missing data and locational errors on spatial concentration measures based on Ripley’s K-function

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Arbia
  • Giuseppe Espa
  • Diego Giuliani
  • Maria Michela Dickson

Abstract

Effects of missing data and locational errors on spatial concentration measures based on Ripley’s K-function. Spatial Economic Analysis. Measures based on Ripley’s K-function are the preferred tools to test the concentration of individual agents in an economic space. In many empirical cases, however, the datasets contain different inaccuracies due to missing data or uncertainty about the location of the agents. Little is known thus far about the effects of these inaccuracies on the K-function. This paper sheds light on the problem through a theoretical analysis supported by Monte Carlo experiments. The results show that patterns of clustering or inhibition may be observed not as genuine phenomena but only as the effect of data imperfections.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani & Maria Michela Dickson, 2017. "Effects of missing data and locational errors on spatial concentration measures based on Ripley’s K-function," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2-3), pages 326-346, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:12:y:2017:i:2-3:p:326-346
    DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2017.1297479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17421772.2017.1297479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17421772.2017.1297479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Julian Besag & Peter J. Diggle, 1977. "Simple Monte Carlo Tests for Spatial Pattern," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 26(3), pages 327-333, November.
    3. Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2009. "Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 623-663, September.
    4. Stuart S. Rosenthal & William C. Strange, 2003. "Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(2), pages 377-393, May.
    5. Gilles Duranton & Henry G. Overman, 2005. "Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(4), pages 1077-1106.
    6. Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Danny Quah, 2009. "A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space," Studies in Empirical Economics, in: Giuseppe Arbia & Badi H. Baltagi (ed.), Spatial Econometrics, pages 81-103, Springer.
    7. Marcon, Eric & Traissac, Stéphane & Puech, Florence & Lang, Gabriel, 2015. "Tools to Characterize Point Patterns: dbmss for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(c03).
    8. Alan B. Krueger, 2003. "Economic Considerations and Class Size," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(485), pages 34-63, February.
    9. Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani, 2016. "Dirty spatial econometrics," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 177-189, January.
    10. K. J. Arrow, 1971. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 11, pages 131-149, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2009. "Measures of the Geographic Concentration of Industries: Improving Distance-Based Methods," Working Papers halshs-00372617, HAL.
    12. Henderson, J. Vernon, 2003. "Marshall's scale economies," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-28, January.
    13. Arbia, Giuseppe & Piras, Gianfranco, 2009. "A new class of spatial concentration measures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4471-4481, October.
    14. Maurel, Francoise & Sedillot, Beatrice, 1999. "A measure of the geographic concentration in french manufacturing industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 575-604, September.
    15. Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani, 2015. "Measurement Errors Arising When Using Distances in Microeconometric Modelling and the Individuals’ Position Is Geo-Masked for Confidentiality," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Mansfield, Edwin, 1995. "Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations:," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 77(1), pages 55-65, February.
    17. Hopenhayn, Hugo A, 1992. "Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(5), pages 1127-1150, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani & Rocco Micciolo, 2017. "A spatial analysis of health and pharmaceutical firm survival," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1560-1575, July.
    2. Li, Dongya & Lu, Yi & Wu, Mingqin, 2012. "Industrial agglomeration and firm size: Evidence from China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 135-143.
    3. William R. Kerr & Scott Duke Kominers, 2015. "Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 877-899, October.
    4. Brad R. Humphreys & Amir B. Ferreira Neto, 2020. "Localization Economies and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Football Teams in Sao Paulo, Brazil," Working Papers 20-09, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    5. William R. Kerr, 2010. "The Agglomeration of US Ethnic Inventors," NBER Chapters, in: Agglomeration Economics, pages 237-276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Juan Alcácer & Minyuan Zhao, 2016. "Zooming in: A practical manual for identifying geographic clusters," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 10-21, January.
    7. Giulio Cainelli & Roberto Ganau & Yuting Jiang, 2020. "Detecting space–time agglomeration processes over the Great Recession using firm-level micro-geographic data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 419-445, October.
    8. Jetpan Wetwitoo & Hironori Kato, 2017. "Inter-regional transportation and economic productivity: a case study of regional agglomeration economies in Japan," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 59(2), pages 321-344, September.
    9. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    10. Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2009. "Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 623-663, September.
    11. Frank G. van Oort & Martijn J. Burger & Joris Knoben & Otto Raspe, 2012. "Multilevel Approaches And The Firm-Agglomeration Ambiguity In Economic Growth Studies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 468-491, July.
    12. Lychagin, Sergey, 2016. "Spillovers, absorptive capacity and agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 17-35.
    13. Fu, Shihe, 2007. "Smart Cafe Cities: Testing human capital externalities in the Boston metropolitan area," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 86-111, January.
    14. Edward L. Glaeser & Joshua D. Gottlieb, 2009. "The Wealth of Cities: Agglomeration Economies and Spatial Equilibrium in the United States," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(4), pages 983-1028, December.
    15. Lu, Yi & Ni, Juan & Tao, Zhigang & Yu, Linhui, 2013. "City–industry growth in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 135-147.
    16. De Silva, Dakshina G. & McComb, Robert P., 2011. "Geographic concentration and firm survival," MPRA Paper 32906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Koster, Hans R.A. & van Ommeren, Jos & Rietveld, Piet, 2014. "Estimation of semiparametric sorting models: Explaining geographical concentration of business services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 14-28.
    18. Arbia, G. & Espa, G. & Giuliani, D. & Mazzitelli, A., 2012. "Clusters of firms in an inhomogeneous space: The high-tech industries in Milan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 3-11.
    19. Baldwin, John R. Beckstead, Desmond Brown, W. Mark Rigby, David, 2007. "Urban Economies and Productivity," Economic Analysis (EA) Research Paper Series 2007045e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    20. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:12:y:2017:i:2-3:p:326-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RSEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.