IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v45y2025i1p54-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Curvilinear relationship between customer engagement and responses to service failures

Author

Listed:
  • Yun-na Park
  • Taeshik Gong

Abstract

Drawing on the activation theory and the Exit-Voice-Loyalty-Neglect model, this study examines how the level of customer engagement affects the four different types of customer responses to a service failure in the mobile application context. In addition, we investigate the moderating role of relationship quality in those relationships. This study used data from a self-administrated online survey of 345 South Korean customers who had experienced a mobile application service failure. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was applied to our conceptual model. The results revealed a U-shape relationship between customer engagement and destructive responses (i.e. exit and neglect), as well as an inverted U-shape relationship between customer engagement and constructive responses (i.e. loyalty and voice). Furthermore, a greater relationship quality reinforces the relationship between customer engagement and responses to service failures, except for loyalty. This study addresses the inconsistent research findings of customer engagement by suggesting the curvilinear relationship between customer engagement and response to service failure. Additionally, it provides new insights for marketers or managers to develop marketing strategies to operate mobile applications efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun-na Park & Taeshik Gong, 2025. "Curvilinear relationship between customer engagement and responses to service failures," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 54-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:54-80
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2164273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2022.2164273
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2022.2164273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:54-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.