IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v40y2020i3-4p315-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Status demotion in loyalty programmes: the role of perceived unfairness

Author

Listed:
  • Shanta Banik
  • Yongqiang Gao

Abstract

Hierarchical loyalty programmes are widely adopted by service companies to enhance their relationships with customers. However, its negative effect, especially when customers are demoted, is relatively less researched. Building on equity theory, this study explores the effect of status demotion on customers’ loyalty intentions through the mediation of perceived unfairness. The moderating roles of status level and purpose of travel are also examined on the relationship between status demotion and perceived unfairness. Evidence from 220 airline customers in China shows that status demotion significantly influences customers’ perceived unfairness, which eventually decreases their loyalty intentions. The detrimental effect of status demotion on perceived unfairness is found to be higher for members who are demoted from top tier to low tier than those demoted from other tiers (top to middle and middle to low) and for members who travel for business purposes than for leisure purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanta Banik & Yongqiang Gao, 2020. "Status demotion in loyalty programmes: the role of perceived unfairness," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3-4), pages 315-336, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:40:y:2020:i:3-4:p:315-336
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2018.1477938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2018.1477938
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2018.1477938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Xiaolong & Li, Shuhua & Guo, Yonglin & Fang, Shujie, 2024. "Human or AI robot? Who is fairer on the service organizational frontline," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:40:y:2020:i:3-4:p:315-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.