IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v39y2019i15-16p1123-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital nudging to overcome cognitive resistance in innovation adoption decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Carola Stryja
  • Gerhard Satzger

Abstract

Consumers often resist adopting innovations, even in cases where they acknowledge that these would be beneficial for them. Cognitive biases in consumers’ decision-making may trigger resistance to innovation. We explore cognitive biases’ effects in innovation adoption decisions. Further, we investigate how digital nudging can be used to mitigate this in order to increase the adoption likelihood for an innovation. We build a set of hypotheses and test them in a quasi-field experiment with 821 participants. We first show that the occurrence of cognitive biases correlates with an up to 44% lower likelihood of adopting an innovation. Second, we find that digital nudging can partially overcome resistance to innovation and can increase the innovation adoption likelihood. Our findings contribute to theory by explaining how resistance to innovation is built from a cognitive perspective and how nudging can be used to increase innovation adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Carola Stryja & Gerhard Satzger, 2019. "Digital nudging to overcome cognitive resistance in innovation adoption decisions," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(15-16), pages 1123-1139, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:39:y:2019:i:15-16:p:1123-1139
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2018.1534960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2018.1534960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2018.1534960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemken, Dominic, 2020. "When do defaults stick and when are they ethical? Taxonomy, sytematic review and design recommendations," DARE Discussion Papers 2005, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Malodia, Suresh & Kaur, Puneet & Ractham, Peter & Sakashita, Mototaka & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Why do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 605-618.
    4. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    5. Lemken, Dominic, 2020. "When do defaults stick and when are they ethical? - taxonomy, systematic review and design recommendations," Key Food Choices and Climate Change Project 307568, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    6. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:39:y:2019:i:15-16:p:1123-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.