IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v36y2016i11-12p595-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative strategy in sports industry: team co-branding

Author

Listed:
  • DongHun Lee
  • Michael Cottingham
  • Demetrius Pearson
  • Soon-Ho Kim
  • Jungkun Park

Abstract

This study sought to empirically examine spectator sport perception pertaining to (team) co-brands based on differences in the level of team identification, brand personality fit, and/or product category. Initially, testing stimuli were identified through a pilot study using an established framework on brand personality. Subsequently, four pairs of fictitious co-brands were created by alternating testing elements between team and non-team brands. In the second phase, 389 participants responded to a 29-item questionnaire, in which the data were primarily analyzed via repeated-measures mean-difference tests. The overall findings generally indicate significant differences in the evaluation of (team) co-brands due to varying brand personality fits, product categories, and levels of team identification. Empirical findings of the current study contribute to the literature by suggesting strategies that can be used to position teams as brands, and expanding existing knowledge on the understanding of spectator sport perception of sport brands at large.

Suggested Citation

  • DongHun Lee & Michael Cottingham & Demetrius Pearson & Soon-Ho Kim & Jungkun Park, 2016. "Collaborative strategy in sports industry: team co-branding," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11-12), pages 595-613, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:36:y:2016:i:11-12:p:595-613
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2016.1255727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2016.1255727
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2016.1255727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:36:y:2016:i:11-12:p:595-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.