IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v44y2024i2p159-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Circularities that Limit Diversity: Emancipating Voices

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Anderson-Gough
  • Carla Edgley
  • Keith Robson
  • Nina Sharma

Abstract

This commentary was prompted by a call to consider how our research can give voice to the managed diversity in accounting and contribute to more emancipatory outcomes. Despite numerous developments and initiatives in the name of EDI in accounting, inequalities persist. Reflecting on both our own prior research and a longstanding body of work in this field, we highlight how socialisation processes, discourses and language, spatial management of diversity and prevailing understandings of merit subtly operate together to create a complex set of loops that stymie diversity and inclusion efforts. These loops result in referencing new ideas or practices around diversity and inclusion, back to dominant and exclusionary beliefs about how work and individuals are valued. We contend that the management of diversity, and socialisation processes reinforce individualising ideas of self-worth and identity, and this can cause anxiety about voicing difference and diverse individuals may instead internalise a pressure to fit in.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Anderson-Gough & Carla Edgley & Keith Robson & Nina Sharma, 2024. "Cultural Circularities that Limit Diversity: Emancipating Voices," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 159-168, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:159-168
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2024.2374961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2374961
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2374961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:159-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.