IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v31y2011i2p125-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR in the UK Water Industry: ‘Doing the Right Thing’? A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Moritz Von Schwedler

Abstract

All large business organisations consider corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an important part of business strategy. While this is not disputed, there are doubts over the effectiveness of these strategies and their contribution to a more sustainable development. For, despite all progress, environmental and social problems still exist or seem exacerbated (Meadows et al. , 2004) and there are calls for new analytical lenses and approaches (Gladwin et al. , 1995; Bebbington, 2007) to disentangle the interrelationships between CSR and sustainable development as a business practice. This paper presents selected key issues, which emerged from comprehensive grounded analysis within a UK water company as a manager and provider of a resource that is a necessary ‘social good’ whose availability and supply is increasingly affected by climate change. The case study consisted of an intra-organisational analysis but also included extensively the stakeholders involved in a wider analysis on the drivers and barriers to corporate sustainability. The analysis revealed that undoubtedly there has been progress in promoting sustainable development in the regulated water industry in which the organisation is based. This is evident in requirements for the preparation of 25-year strategic direction statements by water companies, aimed specifically at promoting a more long-term strategic (business) approach and the need to include substantial sustainability targets to demonstrate, for example, how they are responding to the challenges posed by climate change. In order to do so, the industry has not broken with a ‘business as usual’ ideology. It is necessary therefore to engage critically with business organisations in order to advance the agenda for sustainable development. Further, this paper suggests, it is essential to incorporate the complex interdependencies and conceptual ambiguities into analytical frameworks as individual companies seek to address sustainable development through CSR activities. Significantly, it seems evident that more leadership is necessary by government and regulators to ensure that more sustainable business organisations are not impeded by the business case for CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Moritz Von Schwedler, 2011. "CSR in the UK Water Industry: ‘Doing the Right Thing’? A Case Study," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 125-137, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:125-137
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2011.593815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2011.593815
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2011.593815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saravanamuthu, Kala, 2015. "Instilling a sustainability ethos in accounting education through the Transformative Learning pedagogy: A case-study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-36.
    2. Saravanamuthu, Kala & Lehman, Cheryl, 2013. "Enhancing stakeholder interaction through environmental risk accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 410-437.
    3. Silvia Cantele & Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2018. "A New Framework for Assessing the Sustainability Reporting Disclosure of Water Utilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:31:y:2011:i:2:p:125-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.