IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2022y2022i3p216-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial modelling of risk premiums for water damage insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Christian Wahl
  • Fredrik Lohne Aanes
  • Kjersti Aas
  • Sindre Froyn
  • Daniel Piacek

Abstract

In this paper, we compare different spatial models for modelling the risk premium for water damage insurance on the level of the policyholder. We evaluate four models that take the spatial variability into account: (1) the Intrinsic Conditional Auto-Regressive (ICAR) model; (2) the Besag, York, Mollier (BYM) model; (3) the independent random effects model; and (4) a spatial spline model. The models are compared on a huge data set from the Norwegian insurance company Gjensidige containing seven million observations of policyholders during the period 2011–2018. While Bayesian methods are most frequently used for inference in Gaussian Markov Random Field models, we take a frequentist approach and estimate the model parameters using Laplace approximated restricted maximum likelihood. Using the R package mgcv, we compare the different models for claim frequency, claim size and combined in a risk premium model in a comprehensive cross-validation study. Practical measures such as the loss ratio lift, double lift and Gini index are used to compare performance. Finally, we also compare mgcv with INLA and show that for reasonable big data sets we get identical estimates at a much lower computational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Christian Wahl & Fredrik Lohne Aanes & Kjersti Aas & Sindre Froyn & Daniel Piacek, 2022. "Spatial modelling of risk premiums for water damage insurance," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2022(3), pages 216-233, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:3:p:216-233
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2021.1951346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2021.1951346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2021.1951346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2022:y:2022:i:3:p:216-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.