IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2017y2017i8p651-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial fairness and conditional indexation

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten Kleinow
  • Johannes M. Schumacher

Abstract

Collective pension contracts can generate advantages for their participants by implementing forms of risk sharing. To ensure the continuity of a collective scheme, it has to be monitored whether the contracts offered to participants are financially fair in terms of their market value. When risk sharing is implemented by means of optionalities such as conditional indexation, the analysis of financial fairness is not straightforward. In this paper, we use a stylised overlapping generations model to study financial fairness for a conditional indexation scheme. We find that financial fairness for all participants at all times is not feasible within a scheme of this type, unless the nature of indexation is such that the scheme is reduced to DC. However, financial fairness for incoming generations at the moment of entry can be realised. We show how to compute the fair contribution rate as a function of the current nominal asset/liability ratio for a given level of nominal entitlements. At low levels of the ratio, the fair contribution for incoming generations is also relatively low; nevertheless, the joining of a new generation still has a positive effect on the asset/liability ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten Kleinow & Johannes M. Schumacher, 2017. "Financial fairness and conditional indexation," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2017(8), pages 651-669, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2017:y:2017:i:8:p:651-669
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2016.1225592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2016.1225592
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2016.1225592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2017:y:2017:i:8:p:651-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.