IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2017y2017i5p419-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating the Bühlmann credibility into mortality models to improve forecasting performances

Author

Listed:
  • Cary Chi-Liang Tsai
  • Tzuling Lin

Abstract

In this paper, we incorporate the Bühlmann credibility into three mortality models (the Lee–Carter model, the Cairns–Blake–Dowd model, and a linear relational model) to improve their forecasting performances, as measured by the MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), using mortality data for the UK. The results show that the MAPE reduction ratios for the three mortality models with the Bühlmann credibility are all significant. More importantly, the MAPEs under the three mortality models with the Bühlmann credibility are very close to each other for each age and forecast year. Thus, by incorporating the Bühlmann credibility we are able to converge the forecasting MAPEs resulting from the three different mortality models to a lower and more consistent level. Moreover, we provide a credibility interpretation with an individual time trend for age x and a group time trend for all ages. Finally, we apply the forecasted mortality rates both with and without the Bühlmann credibility to the net single premiums of life insurance products, and compare the corresponding MAPEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cary Chi-Liang Tsai & Tzuling Lin, 2017. "Incorporating the Bühlmann credibility into mortality models to improve forecasting performances," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2017(5), pages 419-440, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2017:y:2017:i:5:p:419-440
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2016.1167115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2016.1167115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2016.1167115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2017:y:2017:i:5:p:419-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.