IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2016y2016i6p502-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress scenario generation for solvency and risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Christian Christiansen
  • Lars Frederik Brandt Henriksen
  • Kristian Juul Schomacker
  • Mogens Steffensen

Abstract

We derive worst-case scenarios in a life insurance model in the case where the interest rate and the various transition intensities are mutually dependent. Examples of this dependence are that (a) surrender intensities and interest rates are high at the same time, (b) mortality intensities of a policyholder as active and disabled, respectively, are low at the same time, and (c) mortality intensities of the policyholders in a portfolio are low at the same time. The set from which the worst-case scenario is taken reflects the dependence structure and allows us to relate the worst-case scenario-based reserve, qualitatively, to a Value-at-Risk-based calculation of solvency capital requirements. This brings out perspectives for our results in relation to qualifying the standard formula of Solvency II or using a scenario-based approach in internal models. Our results are powerful for various applications and the techniques are non-standard in control theory, exactly because our worst-case scenario is deterministic and not adapted to the stochastic development of the portfolio. The formalistic results are exemplified in a series of numerical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Christian Christiansen & Lars Frederik Brandt Henriksen & Kristian Juul Schomacker & Mogens Steffensen, 2016. "Stress scenario generation for solvency and risk management," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2016(6), pages 502-529, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2016:y:2016:i:6:p:502-529
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2014.971860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2014.971860
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2014.971860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2016:y:2016:i:6:p:502-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.