IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2016y2016i4p338-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian and Bühlmann credibility for phase-type distributions with a univariate risk parameter

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Hassan Zadeh
  • David A. Stanford

Abstract

Credibility theory is a statistical tool to calculate the premium for the next period based on past claims experience and the manual rate. Each contract is characterized by a risk parameter. A phase-type (or PH) random variable, which is defined as the time until absorption in a continuous-time Markov chain, is fully characterized by two sets of parameters from that Markov chain: the initial probability vector and transition intensity matrix. In this article, we identify an interpretable univariate risk parameter from amongst the many candidate parameters, by means of uniformization. The resulting density form is then expressed as an infinite mixture of Erlang distributions. These results are used to obtain a tractable likelihood function by a recursive formula. Then the best estimator for the next premium, i.e. the Bayesian premium, as well as its approximation by the Bühlmann credibility premium are calculated. Finally, actuarial calculations for the Bühlmann and Bayesian premiums are investigated in the context of a gamma prior, and illustrated by simulated data in a series of examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Hassan Zadeh & David A. Stanford, 2016. "Bayesian and Bühlmann credibility for phase-type distributions with a univariate risk parameter," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2016(4), pages 338-355, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2016:y:2016:i:4:p:338-355
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2014.926977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2014.926977
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2014.926977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2016:y:2016:i:4:p:338-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.