IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v2014y2014i5p439-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling critical illness claim diagnosis rates I: methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Erengul Ozkok
  • George Streftaris
  • Howard Waters
  • A. David Wilkie

Abstract

In a series of two papers, this paper and the one by Ozkok et al. (Modelling critical illness claim diagnosis rates II: results), we develop statistical models to be used as a framework for estimating, and graduating, Critical Illness (CI) insurance diagnosis rates. We use UK data for 1999–2005 supplied by the Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) to illustrate their use. In this paper, we set out the basic methodology. In particular, we set out some models, we describe the data available to us and we discuss the statistical distribution of estimators proposed for CI diagnosis inception rates. A feature of CI insurance is the delay, on average about 6 months but in some cases much longer, between the diagnosis of an illness and the settlement of the subsequent claim. Modelling this delay, the so-called Claim Delay Distribution, is a necessary first step in the estimation of the claim diagnosis rates and this is discussed in the present paper. In the subsequent paper, we derive and discuss diagnosis rates for CI claims from ‘all causes’ and also from specific causes.

Suggested Citation

  • Erengul Ozkok & George Streftaris & Howard Waters & A. David Wilkie, 2014. "Modelling critical illness claim diagnosis rates I: methodology," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2014(5), pages 439-457.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2014:y:2014:i:5:p:439-457
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2012.728537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2012.728537
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.2012.728537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2014:y:2014:i:5:p:439-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.