IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rurpxx/v11y2018i1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should we care about neutrality in the city?

Author

Listed:
  • Avigail Ferdman

Abstract

Neutrality in political philosophy is a contested idea. The paper argues that there are valid moral reasons to incorporate neutrality in spatial organization considerations, by appealing to universal reasons rather than sectarian reasons. This is a view that defends ‘justificatory neutrality’. The paper responds to previous concerns regarding the applicability of neutrality in the spatial sphere, arguing that the conception of justificatory neutrality successfully addresses these concerns. Yet, the paper raises doubts whether the arguments that persist in the current political philosophy literature can or should, at the end of the day, be applied to the spatial sphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Avigail Ferdman, 2018. "Should we care about neutrality in the city?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:1-18
    DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1276616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17535069.2016.1276616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17535069.2016.1276616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rurp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.